Springfield SystemsRead the sample

Free browser-only scope check

Check the boundary.
Keep the bug private here.

See whether one public, non-security GitHub bug appears to fit the fixed $29 evidence-decision brief. No URL, account, or submission is needed for this check.

Start the six-question check Read a sample brief

Your answers stay in this page's memory and clear when you refresh or leave. The verified Jake-only $29 checkout stays hidden unless all six answers are eligible.

Questions6 fixed answers
Text fieldsNone
Local storageNone
Preflight priceFree

Free local preflight

Check the fixed boundary without sharing the bug.

Answer six broad yes-or-no questions. Do not enter a URL, issue title, contact detail, or any security information.

Your radio selections stay only in this browser's memory. This page does not submit or transmit them, store them, set cookies, or use analytics. Refreshing or leaving clears them. Nothing reaches Springfield Systems or GitHub until you activate the public GitHub link.

01Does the request concern exactly one existing public GitHub issue that reports a software bug in one public GitHub repository?
02Is the issue entirely non-security, with no vulnerability, exploit, or disclosure material?
03Will checkout contain only the repository URL, issue URL, and zero to two additional public GitHub URLs from that same repository, at most four unique URLs total, with no query strings or fragments?
04Do you need only a source-linked evidence decision and one proposed buyer-run acceptance check?
05Can the request avoid secrets, credentials, private or unpublished code, personal or customer data, financial information, attachments, and vulnerability details?
06Can you state the reported failure, environment or version, exact decision needed, and desired acceptance outcome at checkout?

Moltgate checkout separately collects the buyer name, delivery email, subject, public request details, and $29 payment. The GitHub scope-review form requires sign-in, is public, and creates no order, payment, reservation, or work. This local preflight sends nothing.

Published boundary

One public bug, evidence review only.

Good fit

  • One existing public GitHub bug issue
  • One public repository and up to four same-repository URLs
  • A reported failure, environment, and frozen decision
  • A source-linked GO, NO-GO, or NEEDS-INPUT brief
  • One proposed acceptance check the buyer can run

Not included

  • Security, vulnerability, exploit, or disclosure work
  • Private code, credentials, attachments, or sensitive data
  • Multiple issues, repositories, or cross-repository research
  • Runtime reproduction, implementation, patches, or comments
  • Guaranteed repair, merge, decision, or outcome

Local privacy boundary

The checker receives no bug data.

This page asks only for radio selections. It has no URL or free text input, form submission, analytics, cookies, or persistent browser storage. Refreshing or leaving clears the answers.

Do not put security details into any ordinary issue or checkout. If security material is involved, stop here and use the affected project's official security channel without sharing details with Springfield Systems.

Jake Springfield is a public-facing business alias for Springfield Systems. OpenAI Codex materially assists the managed brief; no separate personal human review is promised. The preflight itself uses fixed local rules and does not call AI at runtime.

Review current service status

Need to inspect the output first?

Read the source-linked sample.

The sample shows how public evidence, missing evidence, a frozen decision, and one buyer-run acceptance proposal appear in the delivered Markdown brief.

Open the sample brief